Skip to content
Home » Female Urology » Urological considerations of pregnancy

Urological considerations of pregnancy

Physiological changes in pregnancy:

  • Increase in CO and HR
  • Reduced BP, vasodilation
  • Reduction in venous return and subsequent hypotension in supine position with caval compression – elevate right side during surgery
  • Increased oxygen consumption up to 40 %
  • Increase in circulating plasma volume up to 50 %
  • 10 x risk of VTE due to venous stasis secondary to IVC compression as well as increases in plasma concentrations of procoagulants

 

Physiological changes leading to hydronephrosis:

  • Increased renal blood flow, with GFR increasing by 50 % and increased urine output
  • Mechanical compression of pelvis and retroperitoneum causing dilation of collecting systems, right > left
  • Higher levels of progesterone causes smooth muscle relaxation
  • Right sided more common due to gravid uterus dextro-rotation, left side protected by gas filled sigmoid, and potentially right ureter compressed by dilated right gonadal vein which crosses
    • Right sided dilation in up to 90 % by end of third trimester
    • Historically average 15 mm right sided pelvicalyceal dilation, 5 mm on left

 

Principles of operating on pregnant women:

  • Defer operating if possible – but – do not withhold necessary surgery just because a woman is pregnant
  • Multidisciplinary decision making with obstetricians and anaesthetics
  • Consider elevating right side to reduce caval compression which reduces venous return
  • Remember significantly higher VTE risk in pregnant women.
  • Foetal Doppler/monitoring is usually used pre and post-operatively to exclude complication and reassure mother
  • GA can theoretically risk pre-term labour although these risks are small in absolute terms
  • Avoid excess stimulation of cervix during prep
  • Consider omitting fluoroscopy, using ultrasound to check stent placement if available
  • Second trimester is optimal time to operate (avoid risk of inducing labour)
  • No anaesthetic agents seem to have teratogenic effects
  • Operations should be done at hospitals with appropriate neonatal and obstetric services, and obstetricians should be aware the procedure is happening and available if needed
  • Avoid high pressures if operating laparoscopically (aim < 15 mm Hg).

 

 

Principles of imaging during pregnancy:

  • Follow ALARA principles
  • Risk of stochastic effects (no-threshold linear model)
  • Radiation doses < 50 mGy considered largely safe
  • Mainly studied risk is leukaemia – 1.5 – 2 x relative risk with 10 – 20 mGy (background risk 1 in 3000)
  • Risk would be highest during first semester and organogenesis
  • Can use shielding, omit fluoro, ultrasound/MRI instead of CT

Ultrasound is first line imaging modality

  • Operator dependent
  • Renal pelvis, proximal ureteric and VUJ stones may be visible; not mid ureteric
  • Ureteric jet may be useful
  • Resistance index

MRI is second line – indicated if concerns for ureteric stone not elucidated on ultrasound

  • No radiation
  • Non contrast
  • May be difficult to access
  • Stones visualised as filling defects in the high intensity signal of urine on T2
  • MRI contrast/Gad controversial in pregnancy.

CT has best sensitivity and specificity but its use is limited by radiation dose, however:

  • Radiation exposure from non contrast CT is much lower than exposure associated with foetal harm
  • Radiation doses < 50 mGy considered safe in pregnancy
  • Risk minimised in third trimester
  • Should be used as last line imaging
  • Contrast crosses placenta, but no known teratogenic properties. Iodinated – ?effect of thyroid development.

 

Haematuria in pregnancy

  • 20 % microscopic haematuria on dipstick in asymptomatic pregnancy
  • Aetiologies include:
    • UTI / infection
    • Stones
    • Medical renal disease
    • Medications
    • Trauma
    • Tumours – RCC, TCC
    • Preeclampsia
    • Placenta percreta

Preeclampsia – hypertension and proteinuria, with microhaematuria 2- 8 x normal level.

 

Stones in pregnancy

Variable incidence depending on source – between 1 in 200 and 1 in 1500.

Overall incidence appears similar to non-pregnant women of similar ages.

Most patients present in second and third trimester.

Physiological changes in pregnancy contributing to stone formation:

  • Increased vitamin D levels (placental production) -> hypercalciuria
  • Increased renal blood and GFR -> increased filtered solute load
    • Increased urinary concentration of stone inhibitors (citrate and Mg)
    • Increased urinary calcium and glucose
    • Increased urine volumes (preventative)
  • Stasis and increased renal pelvis pressures due to physiological hydronephrosis
  • Elevated urine pH (calcium phosphate stones most common in pregnant women)

Management principles:

  • Multidisciplinary care shared with obstetrician
  • Consider alternate diagnoses as causes of pain (appendicitis, pyelonephritis, colitis)
  • Observation and conservative management should be first line in the absence of infection and uncontrolled pain
  • Attempt to avoid risks to pregnancy – i.e., ionising radiation, risks of anaesthesia, risks of sepsis
  • Management should be undertaken in a centre with both urological and obstetric capability

 

Investigation of women with loin pain:

  • History – loin pain, symptoms of infection, history of UTIs, haematuria and urinary symptoms, obstetric history and complicating features
  • Examination – vital signs, flank tenderness, health of child
  • Blood tests including renal function
  • Urine analysis – blood, nitrites, leukocytes

 

Management of symptomatic stones

In the presence of infection -> ureteric stent.

In the presence of symptoms:

  • Conservative management preferred in the absence of strong indications for intervention
    • Alpha blockers have not been studied in pregnancy
    • 70 – 80 % stones can be successfully managed conservatively
  • Stent (or nephrostomy) which can be maintained during pregnancy, then proceeding to definitive ureteroscopy after pregnancy
  • Primary ureteroscopy and laser of stone

ESWL is contra-indicated.

PCNL has only limited evidence and should rarely be needed in individualised cases in experienced centres.

Nephrostomy is a reasonable alternative to stenting:

  • Can be done without GA
  • Can be done with radiation under ultrasound, and changed in the same way without GA or ultrasound

Ureteric stents tend to encrust quicker in pregnancy due to hypercalciuria and hyperuricosuria:

  • Stents often poorly tolerated with significant analgesia requirements
  • Reduced quality of life
  • May require frequent changes 4 – 8 weekly (with risks associated each time)
  • May be nidus for bacteriuria and subsequent complicated UTIs/sepsis

 

Medications in general

NSAIDs are generally contra-indicated in pregnancy, especially after 20 – 30 weeks.

Categories:

  • A – safe, widely taken with no increase malformations or harmful effects
    • Panadol, cefalexin,
  • B1 – has been taken by limited number of pregnant women without increase in harm, studies in animals have not shown problems
    • Ceftriaxone, piptaz
  • B2 – limited number of pregnant women without increase in harm, lacking or inadequate animal studies without problems
    • Tamsulosin, prazosin, meropenem
  • B3 – limited number of pregnant women without increase in harm, animal studies suggest possible damage of unclear significance in humans
  • C – drugs which have caused or suspected of causing harmful effects which may be reversible
    • Ibuprofen, indomethacin, oxycodone, tramadol
  • D – have caused or suspected to have caused harmful effects like malformations or irreversible damage
    • Gentamicin
  • X – very high risk of causing permanent damage, do not use if possibility of pregnancy
    • Thalidomide

 

Pregnancy in spina bifida

  • Generally normal fertility with 70 % pregnancies successful
  • Often have latex allergies
  • Multidisciplinary – MFM, neonatology, ortho, high risk obstetrics, anaesthetics, neurosurgeons
  • 1 – 8 % risk of neural tube defects in children of those with NTD
  • Patients have usually had an array for reconstructive urological surgery

Potential issues include:

  • Renal function is at risk – usually affected from start, any UTIs, ureteric compression, hypertension etc may contribute to further decline
  • High risk of stones – subsequent UTIs, obstruction
  • High risk of UTIs during pregnancy, consideration of prophylaxis
  • Potential threat to vascular supply of augmented or reconstructed bowel segments (due to compression by gravid uterus or surgery)
  • Compression or prolapse of catheterisable channels
  • Choice of delivery – influenced by previous surgical interventions, foetal health and presentation, and any other underlying anatomic issues
  • Potential threat to continence after delivery especially if has required bladder neck recon or SUI procedures in past
  • VP shunt if in situ could be compressed during pregnancy or infected during operations
  • Narrow bony pelvis or hips could preclude vaginal delivery
  • Depending on patients’ sensation and motor function – may not be able to detect or voluntarily push during labour

 

If doing C-section in patient with augment/neobladder – ensure drainage of bladder pre-op, high ‘classical’ c-section, mesentery to bowel segment should be identified and kept away from uterus, should be done electively if at all possible.